Help Please! | Camera Issue? Lens? Settings?

Discussion in 'Photography Pad' started by crystalbella77, Apr 10, 2016.

  1. crystalbella77

    crystalbella77 Capture life and embrace it

    Messages:
    3,779
    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2009
    So..I take A LOT of pictures. With my phone but mostly with my DSLR. I have a Canon T3 that I have been using daily for 4-5 years. It's a good little low end DSLR. Lately, I have noticed when I take pics and look at them at 100% they are blurry. :( It makes me really really sad!

    Here is a picture SOOC:
    [​IMG]

    I focused on his top eye and when I look at it at 100% it is blurry like this:
    [​IMG]

    Here are my image properties:
    camera-settings.jpg
    camera-settings_2.jpg

    IS something off on the settings? Do I just need to upgrade? I want to upgrade desperately, but when I do I want to go a few models up and would ideally like to have at least $1000 saved for it. (No credit here)

    Is 72 dpi really low? I save my scrapbooking pages at 300...Anyone know how to change that on a Canon?? I can google if not...but thought I would check! This has been driving me soooo crazy for a few days!
     
  2. enjoyyourpix

    enjoyyourpix My mama don't like you

    Messages:
    1,721
    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2014
    I have a Nikon, but what about this to reset defaults ...
     
    crystalbella77 likes this.
  3. catschwartz

    catschwartz Active Member

    Messages:
    165
    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2012
    i probably can't help too much either, because i also have a Nikon, but a couple of thoughts- if it has been good before, I would also suggest trying to reset the defaults and see what happens. On the Nikon the vibration reduction button is on the lens and sometimes the VR gets turned off and then my photos are blurry. i know on the cannon it is on the camera itself, but i am not sure where.
    Also maybe the lens just needs a professional cleaning? Maybe something got on the mechanism?
    Good luck!
     
    crystalbella77 likes this.
  4. mollyc

    mollyc PrettyPinkPicturesPlease

    Messages:
    3,185
    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2012
    1/60 is really too slow for handholding a camera with a baby. Your ISO is pretty high and if maxed out you need more light somehow.
     
  5. 3littleks

    3littleks Pass the gold and the glitter, please!

    Messages:
    2,312
    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2009
    I would say it is a few things.

    You are shooting at a super high ISO which will make for a lot of grain. That can make your image seem soft. Also, if you are shooting at 1/60 and f1.8 you will have blur basically everywhere but your focus point is. Any movement when you take the photo and focus will jump.
    I noticed on my 35mm the focus is really off when I shoot that open with that slow of a shutter speed and higher ISO's. (I try to stay over 1/100 and keep my ISO's under 1600 as much as possible.)
    example, my hubby while we were on vaca last week. Neither of us moved when I took the photo but somehow it was blurry. I was at F1.8 and 1/100. My ISO's were low too. Around 800 I think. It is really just hard to shoot wide open with a slow shutter. I was focused directly on his eye and the focus slipped off somewhere into the unknown. haha

    [​IMG]

    here is the crop...

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Apr 10, 2016
    crystalbella77 likes this.
  6. crystalbella77

    crystalbella77 Capture life and embrace it

    Messages:
    3,779
    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2009
    I appreciate all this help sooooo much! I am fiddling and trying to take some new pics to compare. I'll BRB!
     
    enjoyyourpix likes this.
  7. crystalbella77

    crystalbella77 Capture life and embrace it

    Messages:
    3,779
    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2009
    ok...I upped the aperature and lowered the ISO...do you think this looks better?

    SOOC inside at 7:30 at night and overhead "daylight" bulbs.

    sooc2.jpg

    and up close:
    upclose_2.jpg

    It's still a wee bit blurry but I think it looks better no?

    I was talking to hubby and apparently this camera is 6 years old...so I am probably due for an upgrade but I Would like to figure out what I am doing wrong first. :/
     
    3littleks likes this.
  8. 3littleks

    3littleks Pass the gold and the glitter, please!

    Messages:
    2,312
    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2009
    Better! Still a little bit OOF but not as noticeable. ❤️
     
    crystalbella77 likes this.
  9. crystalbella77

    crystalbella77 Capture life and embrace it

    Messages:
    3,779
    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2009
    yes definitely still a wee bit soft but I think I am in the right direction! I will play more tomorrow during the day!
     
    3littleks likes this.
  10. mollyc

    mollyc PrettyPinkPicturesPlease

    Messages:
    3,185
    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2012
    You aren't doing anything wrong per se. But based on the settings of your first photo you simply didn't have enough light. As Brenda said higher iso causes grain, and coupled with the very slow shutter speed, you get blur.

    Put your subject near a window that is bright ( but not in direct sun) and then play with settings. Mixed lighting isn't going to give you the best results, either.

    Aim for a SS of no less than 1/125 and preferably 1/200 or faster. And I would stop down to f/3.2 or so until you get the hang of focusing.

    Practicing at night with lightbulbs is not going to tell you much about the ability of your camera.

    I think you just need more light overall.
     
  11. navaja77

    navaja77 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,458
    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2012
    High ISO is not necessarily a bad thing. It looks grainy but mostly, it's because of the motion blur. If you nail the focus, make sure it's properly exposed, the high ISO won't matter as much. We shoot the moment and sometimes, that means we are shooting at night, in mixed lighting, etc. but so long as you have a properly exposed and in focus photo, it'll look good.

    Yes, try to keep the SS at minimum 1/250 for young kids and 1/125 for adults/older kids. As for aperture, f/1.8 is a challenging aperture to grab good focus because it's such a very thin focal plane. It's best to keep the aperture at f/3.2 or higher until you get better practice at f/1.8.

    If you can't upgrade, using the flash but bouncing the light will help you out. I would recommend an external flash but if you can't or don't want to go that route, try a light scoop. It's an attachment that goes on your pop-up flash to help you bounce the light up so you don't get that flashy photo.
     
  12. bestcee

    bestcee In love with places I've never been to

    Messages:
    19,379
    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2013
    So, this is a little random. But next to the viewfinder, is a little teeny tiny wheel called the "diopter". Mine got turned one day, on accident. Until I realized it, my focus was always a little off. If this problem is recent, and didn't happen previously, you may want to check it. If it's not recent, then I wouldn't touch it.

    **This is not anywhere near as helpful as the light info above. It's strictly because it was driving me nuts when it happened, and a very hard thing to narrow down.
     
  13. mollyc

    mollyc PrettyPinkPicturesPlease

    Messages:
    3,185
    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2012
    The diopter only affects the focus within the viewfinder - it's basically like glasses for the viewfinder. The diopter can be way off for you and crystal clear for someone else. It does not affect focus within the camera or lens itself.

    The only way the diopter would matter is if you are manually focusing your camera with the ring on the lens.
     
  14. bestcee

    bestcee In love with places I've never been to

    Messages:
    19,379
    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2013
    Yep. Her stats didn't say either way. :-) It was when I was practicing manual focus that I had the problem. I should have specified, sorry!
     
  15. FarrahJobling

    FarrahJobling FarrahJobling

    Messages:
    7,130
    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2012
    I think the problem is that you don't have enough light for what you are asking. The combination of ISO 3200 AND f1.8 AND SS 1/60 AND dpi72 is never going to give you a crisp image.

    You could test your camera or send it in to Canon for calibration, but I'm guessing that it's not the camera. =(
     
  16. FarrahJobling

    FarrahJobling FarrahJobling

    Messages:
    7,130
    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2012
    this =)
     
  17. navaja77

    navaja77 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,458
    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2012
    For photography, dpi is a non-issue for digital cameras. It's the resolution that is more important for PRINTING the photo, not necessarily the quality of the photo. For crisp image, you have to make sure it's properly exposed and focused - and it all goes back to your ISO, aperture and shutter speed settings.
     
    bestcee and FarrahJobling like this.
  18. FarrahJobling

    FarrahJobling FarrahJobling

    Messages:
    7,130
    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2012
    Right...yes....I thinking in terms of printing being the ultimate goal for her scrapbook layouts.
     
  19. BevG

    BevG If I can't remember it, it didn't happen

    Messages:
    5,712
    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2015
    For posed portraits, try using a tripod as that can greatly reduce camera shake.
     
  20. navaja77

    navaja77 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,458
    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2012
    While that is a good idea if you have a subject who stays still but for kids, not a good idea. You have to be mobile to take that shot, especially at different angles. I generally only use my tripod for remote shots (if I'm in the photo) or long exposure shots.
     

Share This Page